M.T.Prasad v. Biju Prabhakar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court recorded the respondent counsel's submission that directions in a prior judgment were complied with and closed the contempt case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CON.CASE(C) NO.735 OF 2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 735 OF 2022
(JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.770 OF 2022 DATED 04.02.2022)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
M.T.PRASAD AGED 56 YEARS S/O M.N.THANKAPPAN, MAZHUKKAVIL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM P.O, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686506
BY ADV SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
BIJU PRABHAKAR
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.T.PRASAD
- respondent
BIJU PRABHAKAR
- respondent
THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court