Aparna Mohan v. Anitha P I
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, a petitioner alleged non-compliance with directions to approve her regularization as an office attendant. The respondent submitted she complied by approving the appointment and sanctioning salary up to 30.06.2019, beyond which the petitioner pursued B.Ed. The Court found compliance and closed the case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 722 OF 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 722 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.23055/2021 DATED 25.11.2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
APARNA MOHAN OFFICE ATTENDANT APPOINTEE RESIDING AT KANJIRAPPARA NALUKETTU PRAKKANAM P.O. PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,PIN – 689643
BY ADV V.B.PREMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent has complied with the directions issued in the earlier judgment dated 25.11.2021 regarding the petitioner's regularization.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aparna Mohan
- respondent
Anitha P I
- respondent
Nisha Bose
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court