Joy Joseph v. Devi Das
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt of court case as the Housing Board had complied with the direction and issued the required Ext.R1(a), leaving nothing for consideration.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 623 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 18120/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
JOY JOSEPH
AGED 65 YEARS
101 EMBASSY BUILDING, KANNUR, PIN - 670002
BY ADVS.
C.K.SREEJITH
NISHAD NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT/S:
DEVI DAS
SECRETARY, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, AGE NOT KNOWN TO
THE PETITIONER,
FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
HOUSING BOARD COMPLEX, SHANTI NAGAR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001, PIN - 695001
BY ADVS.
DENNY DEVASSY
V.HARISH
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 24.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JOY JOSEPH
- respondent
DEVI DAS
Coram
V.G. ARUN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court