Babu M.Mathai v. Ani.P.N.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case filed as a confirmation order, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the court's previous directions were complied with. The court accepted the submission and closed the case on the same day.
What did the court decide?
Case closed upon confirmation of compliance with previous directions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2022/4TH CHAITHRA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 180 OF 2022
JUDGMENT DATED 09.09.2021 IN
WP(C) 25508/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BABU M.MATHAI, AGED 49, S/O.MATHAI, MADAPPILLIL HOUSE, AMBUNDU KARA, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, MALAYIDAMTHURUTH P.O. - 683 561.
BY ADVS. V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) N.RAJESH P.GOPAKUMAR
RESPONDENT/CONTEMNOR/2ND RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant has complied with the directions of this court regarding the matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Babu M. Mathai
- respondent
Ani P. N.
Coram
N. Nagareswara
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court