N.N.Raveendran v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought certified copies of documents lost in floods. Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file a formal application before the respondent.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a properly constituted application before the first respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 290 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
N.N.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O. KOCHUNNI NANUKUTTY, NELLIKUNATH VEEDU, PADAYATTUPARAMBIL, CHAKATHARA, KEEDAMANGALAM, NORTH PARAVUR.
BY ADV PRASAD CHANDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682011.
- 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE OFFICE, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM, PIN-683512.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a properly constituted application can be granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.N. Raveendran
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Kanayannur Taluk Office, Ernakulam
- respondent
The Village Officer, Office of the Village Office, North Paravur, Ernakulam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court