S.Padmakumari, v. Aji K.R
Case brief
What is this about?
This court closed a contempt petition alleging violation of an interim order. The court found that the municipality substantially complied with the writ judgment by disposing of the petitioners' representation within the stipulated period, rendering no further orders necessary.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt of Court Case is closed; no further orders required.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022/30TH POUSHA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1660 OF 2021
JUDGMENT DATED 12.07.2019 IN
WP(C) 11638/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
1 S.PADMAKUMARI, AGED 49 YEARS, D/O SAVITHRI, ARANINNAVILLA VEEDU, KOTTAPURAMCHERRY, KOTTAPURAM VILLAGE, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 301.
2 K. SAVITHRI, AGED 76 YEARS, W/O. P.K.KARUNAKARAN, ARANINNAVILLA VEEDU, KOTTAPURAMCHERRY, KOTTAPURAM VILLAGE, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 301.
BY ADVS. B.PRAMOD NAMITHA JYOTHISH
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should be proceeded with upon claim of violation of interim order regarding maintenance of status quo.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. PADMAKUMARI
- petitioner
K. SAVITHRI
- respondent
AJI K.R.
- respondent
SINDHU S.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court