In this contempt petition alleging non-compliance with W.P.(C) No. 2615 of 2019, the court accepted counsel’s production of an order dated 15.03.2022 establishing compliance and closed the case. No punishment was awarded.
Contempt case closed; no punishment awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 135 OF 2022
JUDGMENT DATED 19.02.2019 IN WP(C) 2615/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O.PONNAPPAN ACHARY, NADUVEETTIL HOUSE, ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 631.
W/O.N.P.SELVARAJAN, NADUVEETIL HOUSE, ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 631.
S/O.N.P.SELVARAJAN, NADUVEETTIL HOUSE, ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 631.
S/O.N.P.SELVARAJAN, NADUVETTIL HOUSE, ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN 686 631.
BY ADVS. IVANS C. CHAMAKKALA P.R.ASHOK KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/3RD RESPONDENT:
KAVITHA S. KUMAR, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, ETTUMANOOR MUNICIPALITY, ETTUMANOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN- 686 631.
BY ADV SHRI.SIBY CHENAPPADY, SC, ETTUMANOOR MUNICIPALITY
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.O..(C) No. 135/2022
: 2 :
Dated this the 20th day of May, 2022.
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case is filed complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 19.02.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 2615 of 2019 is not complied with.
Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.
Rv
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the directives of the judgment dated 19.02.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 2615 of 2019 have been complied with.
Whether the contempt case should be pursued further given the production of compliance order.
N.P.SELVARAJ
SHANTHAMMA SELVARAJ
RAHUL.N.S.
RAJEEV.N.S.
KAVITHA S. KUMAR
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
