K.A. Abdul Kareem v. Nissam
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition was withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner, who stated no intention to press the case. The court accepted this submission and closed the matter.
A contempt petition was withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner, who stated no intention to press the case. The court accepted this submission and closed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 13TH KARTHIKA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1303 OF 2022
JUDGMENT DATED 04.03.2022 IN WP(C)19866/2014 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
CONTEMPT PETITIONER/PETITIONER
K.A. ABDUL KAREEM AGED 53 YEARS PWD CONTRACTOR, RESIDING AT ALISHA MANZIL, KIZHAKKEKARA, TRIKKAKARA POST ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682021
BY ADVS.C.K.SREEJITH NIMISHA P. SHANMUGHAN
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO. 2:
NISSAM AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OTHER PERSONAL DETAILS ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682035
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con. Case.(C.) No. 1303/2022
2
JUDGMENT
This contempt petition is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directions contained in the judgment dated 04.03.2022 in W.P.(C.) No. 19866/2014 are not complied with.
Therefore, this contempt petition is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY
JUDGE
DCS/04.11.2022
Con. Case.(C.) No. 1303/2022 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C) NO. 19866/2014 ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM DT. 4/3/2022
ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY AFFIDAVIT WAS FILED BY THE PETITIONER
ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
K.A. Abdul Kareem
Nissam
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court