The High Court of Kerala, on the day the arbitration request was filed, dismissed the request as the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw it.
Permission to withdraw the arbitration request. The request was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1944
AR NO. 89 OF 2022
CMA(Arb) NO.164/2022 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT, ERNAKULAM.
PETITIONER :
SUNITHA SURESH, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. PARAMESWARA MENON, RESIDING AT HIMADRI, 37/1383,A6,PANORAMA RESIDENCY, KUMARANASAN ROAD, KADAVANDRA, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 020.
BY ADVS. T.T.HARIKUMAR DIPIN DILEEP JEO GEORGE
RESPONDENTS :
3 ANOOB HABEL, AGED 42 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. UNITED PREMIUM BUILDERS, S/O. V.K. HABEL, RESIDING AT VETTUVELIL HOUSE, GNR-39, VADAKKUMBHAGAM, NEAR POLICE STATION, VAZHAKOOTTAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695 582.
THIS ARBITRATION REQUEST HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.R No.89 of 2022 2
SATHISH NINAN, J.
==================================== Arbitration Request No.89 of 2022
===================================== Dated this the 5th day of August, 2022
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
the arbitration request without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to move afresh at a later state, if so warranted. Permission is granted. The arbitration request is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/SATHISH NINAN, JUDGE
amk
A.R No.89 of 2022 3
APPENDIX OF AR 89/2022
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :
Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF PARTNERSHIP DEED DATED 28.08.2013
Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT DATED 20.11.2013
Annexure3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 14.02.2022
Annexure4 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT 1
Annexure5 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECIEPT 2
Annexure6 TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECIEPT 3
Annexure7 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 07.03.2022
Annexure8 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is in order to withdraw the arbitration request without prejudice to her rights to file a fresh petition.
Sunitha Suresh
United Premium Builders
Vinod Marcilin
Anoob Habel
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
