Dismissed
Sanjeev M. v. Union of India
Kerala HCWP(C)/890/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners, BHEL employees, sought to withdraw a writ petition regarding dues. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 20TH ASWINA, 1943
¶5
WP(C) NO. 890 OF 2021
¶6
PETITIONER/S:
¶7
- 1 SANJEEV M., AGED 38 YEARS S/O. CHANDRASEKHARAN.K, BHEL, ASSISTANT MANAGER, KUNTHIPPADAM HOUSE, KUMARAMPUTHUR P.O, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD-678 583
¶8
- 2 SIJIL K.K,AGED 33 YEARS, S/O. K.K. RAVINDRAN, BHEL, ASSISTANT MANAGER, SURABHI, EMS NAGAR, MATTANNUR P.O, KANNUR-670 702.
¶9
- 3 RAMACHANDRAN P,AGED 54 YEARS S/O. C.M. KUNHIRAMAN, BHEL, MANAGER, SAKETHAM, KUZHINHUDI, CHERUVATHUR P.O, KASARGOD-671 312
¶10
- 4 THANKACHAN P.A,AGED 57 YEARS S/O. ANTONY M.V, (LATE), BHEL, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, THAYANA DALE HOUSE, NO.14/406, RAMDAS NAGAR P.O, KASARGOD-671 124
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sanjeev M. and Others
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
BHEL
- respondent
BHEL Electrical Machines Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court