The holder/applicant in a criminal contempt case was informed about a related order. The court recorded the information and closed the contempt proceedings, reserving the petitioner's right to challenge the substantive order if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 19TH ASWINA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1517 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7504/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
1 MANEESH KUMAR T. AGED 30 YEARS S/O. MOHANDAS, THIRUTHIYIL HOUSE, KARAD PARAMBA, VAZHAYUR POST, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
1 MOHANDAS AGED 50 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE-673020.
BY ADV. SRI. V VENUGOPAL, GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1517 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of October, 2021
When the matter was taken up, the learned Government Pleader invited my attention to a memo
dated 08.10.2021 enclosing a copy of the order of the RTA dated 06.10.2021.
This is recorded and the Contempt of Court Case is closed reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the order of the RTA, if so advised.
Sd/-
SUNIL THOMAS
JUDGE
SKP/11-10
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1517 OF 2021
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1517/2021
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.7504 OF 2021 DATED 9.4.2021.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE: NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
Maneesh Kumar T.
Mohandas
Sunil Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
