Disposed

Secretary, Elamaram Orphanage Adinistrative Committee v. the District Collector and Ex Officio Chairman

Kerala HC8 Jan 2021WP(C)/615/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner alleged an orphanage alumni meeting would violate Covid-19 protocols. The court directed the First and Third respondents to act on representations and ensure protocol compliance.

What did the court decide?

Directed 1st respondent to consider Ext.P2 and take action to ensure no violation of Covid-19 protocols; directed 3rd respondent to act upon Ext.P3.

Secretary, Elamaram Orphanage Adinistrative… — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 18TH POUSHA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.615 OF 2021(B)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

SECRETARY, ELAMARAM ORPHANAGE ADINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE VAZHAKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICTR, PIN-673 640 (REG.NO.7/1971).

¶8

BY ADVS. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN SRI.M.ANUROOP

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND EX OFFICIO CHAIRMAN DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM-676 505.

¶11

2 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, MALAPPURAM, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676 505.

¶12

3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VAZHAKKAD, VAZHAKKAD P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 640.

¶13

4 P.PAREEKUTTY HAJI, ENGINEER, PUTHANTHARA HOUSE, CHERUPPA, MAVOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673 661.

¶14

SMT.VINITHA.B , GP

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

¶17

WP(C).No.615 OF 2021(B)

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

Dated this the 8th day of January 2021

¶20

This writ petition is filed stating that,

¶21

general body meeting of alumni of Elamaram

¶22

Yetheemkhana is being conducted on 10.01.2021 and

¶23

there are 500 members in the watsapp group and

¶24

there will be more than 1000 alumnus, who are

¶25

likely to assemble in the orphanage, which would

¶26

be in violation of Covid 19 protocol. The

¶27

petitioner points out that, he has already approached the 1^st and 3^rd respondents pointing out the apprehended violation of protocol.

¶28

The learned Government Pleader points out

¶29

that, any meeting can be conducted in accordance

¶30

with the protocol and it will be a matter for

¶31

consideration by the respondent Nos. 1 and 3.

¶32

This writ petition is disposed of directing the 1^st respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation

¶33

¶34

WP(C).No.615 OF 2021(B)

¶35

and to take appropriate action, to see that there

¶36

is no violation of covid-19 protocol. There shall

¶37

be a further direction to the 3^rd respondent also to

¶38

act upon Ext.P3 complaint, in accordance with law.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA

JUDGE

hmh

WP(C).No.615 OF 2021(B)

¶45

APPENDIX

¶46

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶47

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF WATSAPP MESSAGE.

¶48

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05.01.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

¶49

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05.01.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶50

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

Secretary, Elamaram Orphanage Adinistrative Committee v. the District Collector and Ex Officio Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Secretary, Elamaram Orphanage Adinistrative Committee v. the District Collector and Ex Officio Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashraf v.P., Vs State of Kerala

Srijit R. Das Vs the Secretary

Naveenraj Vs Director General of Police

Jacob John Vs State of Kerala

V.K.Varghese Vs Kerala State Small Scale Industries Association

M/S.Revive Construction Company (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Kerala