Partly allowed

Rineesh, v. Union of India

Kerala HC8 Mar 2021WP(C)/3536/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of five connected writ petitions filed by passengers injured in an Air India Express accident at Kozhikode. Acknowledging prior directions that petitioners must negotiate compensation offers before approaching forums, the court allowed petitions and granted liberty to approach appropriate legal forums if dissatisfied with any offer made.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of; liberty granted to approach Court or other appropriate legal forum if aggrieved by compensation offer received from the airline respondents.

Rineesh, Vs Union of India — Motor Accident Claims | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942 WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021(H)

¶5

PETITIONER:

¶6

MUHAMMED JUNAID K AGED 25 YEARS R/AT NEW ARAFA (H), KOROTH ROAD, P.O., KUNJIPALLY, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE-673 3010

¶7

BY ADVS. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN SRI.K.P.MUHAMMAD ARIF SHRI.ABDUL JALEEL.U.K

¶8

RESPONDENTS:

¶9

1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, NEW DELHI-110 001

¶10

2 AIR INDIA EXPRESS LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD., DH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 016

¶11

R1 BY ADV. B.PRAMOD, CGC R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ISAAC THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM R2 BY ADV. SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA,SRSC

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).3506/2021(K), WP(C).3536/2021(N), WP(C).3681/2021(I), WP(C).3731/2021(N), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶14

¶15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶16

PRESENT

¶17

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶18

MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942

¶19

WP(C).No.3506 OF 2021(K)

¶20

PETITIONER:

¶21

ASHRAF KAPPUMALA AGED 45 YEARS R/AT KOTTUVATTA PALAMTHALAKKAL (H), PERUVAYAL, P.O.VELAM, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE.

¶22

BY ADVS. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN SRI.K.P.MUHAMMAD ARIF SHRI.ABDUL JALEEL.U.K

¶23

RESPONDENT:

¶24

1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, NEW DELHI-110001.

¶25

2 AIR INDIA EXPRESS LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD., DH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682016.

¶26

R1 BY SMT.MINI GOPINATH, CGC R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA (SR.) R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ISAAC THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM R2 BY ADV. SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).3536/2021(N), WP(C).3681/2021(I), WP(C).3731/2021(N), WP(C).4872/2021(H), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶28

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶29

¶30

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶31

PRESENT

¶32

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶33

MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942

¶34

WP(C).No.3536 OF 2021(N)

¶35

PETITIONER:

¶36

RINEESH, AGED 34 YEARS R/AT GOWRI NILAYAM, NANDIALI MEETHAL, ANNASSERY, THALAKKALATHUR, KOZHIKODE - 673317.

¶37

BY ADVS. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN SRI.K.P.MUHAMMAD ARIF SHRI.ABDUL JALEEL.U.K

¶38

RESPONDENTS:

¶39

1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, NEW DELHI - 110001.

¶40

2 AIR INDIA EXPRESS LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD, DH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682016.

¶41

R1 BY SMT.MINI GOPINATH, CGC R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA (SR.) R2 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM R2 BY ADV. SRI.ISAAC THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS

¶42

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).3506/2021(K), WP(C).3681/2021(I), WP(C).3731/2021(N), WP(C).4872/2021(H), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶43

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶44

¶45

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶46

PRESENT

¶47

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶48

MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942

¶49

WP(C).No.3681 OF 2021(I)

¶50

PETITIONER:

¶51

ASHRAF ATHALAN AGED 63 YEARS R/AT ANEESA MANZIL, KOROTH ROAD P.O., KUNJIPALLY, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE.

¶52

BY ADVS. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN SHRI.ABDUL JALEEL.U.K SRI.K.P.MUHAMMAD ARIF

¶53

RESPONDENTS:

¶54

1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, NEW DELHI-110001.

¶55

2 AIR INDIA EXPRESS LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD., DH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682016.

¶56

R1 BY SMT.MAHESWARY.G., CGC R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA (SR.) R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ISAAC THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM R2 BY ADV. SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA

¶57

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).3506/2021(K), WP(C).3536/2021(N), WP(C).3731/2021(N), WP(C).4872/2021(H), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶58

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶59

¶60

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶61

PRESENT

¶62

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶63

MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942

¶64

WP(C).No.3731 OF 2021(N)

¶65

PETITIONERS:

¶66

JAYAMOL AGED 47 YEARS R/AT ANATHANATH HOUSE, PERUVANNAMOOZHI P.O., PONMALAPPARA, PERAMBRA (VIA), KOZHIKODE 673 528

¶67

BY ADVS. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN SHRI.ABDUL JALEEL.U.K SRI.K.P.MUHAMMAD ARIF

¶68

RESPONDENTS:

¶69

1 UNION OF INDIA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CIVIL STATION, NEW DELHI 110 001.

¶70

2 AIR INDIA EXPRESS LIMITED. REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, AIR INDIA EXPRESS LTD., DH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 016.

¶71

R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA (SR.) R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SRI.ISAAC THOMAS R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM R2 BY ADV. SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS R2 BY ADV. SHRI.SHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA

¶72

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.03.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).3506/2021(K), WP(C).3536/2021(N), WP(C).3681/2021(I), WP(C).4872/2021(H), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶73

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶74

¶75

JUDGMENT

¶76

[ WP(C).4872/2021, WP(C).3506/2021, WP(C).3536/2021, WP(C).3681/2021, WP(C).3731/2021 ]

¶77

Dated this the 8th day of March 2021

¶78

All these writ petitions are filed by the passengers who were injured in the accident which occurred on 07.08.2020 at the Karippur International Airport, Kozhikode during landing of the Air India Express Dubai – Kozhikode Flight IX-1344, an international air carrier. The petitioners have prayed for a direction to the respondents to offer them compensation as required under Rule 25 to 29 and Rule 22(6) of Schedule 3 of the Carriage by Air Act, 1972 at the similar range and level of compensation fixed as in Exts.P11 and P11(a), and in the light of the principles laid down in Paragraph 49 of the judgment in

¶79

National Insurance Co. Ltd. V M/s. Bhogura Polyfab Pvt.

¶80

Ltd. [(2009(1) SCC 267)] and also to grant them liberty to approach the consumer forum for the balance amount. They have also prayed for a direction to the respondents to pay the liability of One Lakh Special Drawing Right (now enhanced to 1,38,000 Special Drawing Right) as injury compensation and loss of baggage under Rule 21(1) and 22(1) of the Third Schedule of the Act and cargo and baggage claim.

¶81

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶82

¶83

The 2^nd respondent has filed a preliminary counter

¶84

affidavit in all these writ petitions, explaining the procedure followed by them till this time, in the matters of determining disbursing compensation on the claims received.

¶85

Heard Sri.Kodoth Sridharan, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Senior counsel Sri.Joseph Kodianthara for the 2^nd respondent.

¶86

In the case of the petitioner in W.P.

¶87

(C).No.3731/2021, the learned Senior Counsel submits that offer letter has already been issued to the petitioner therein. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner it is far lesser compared to the injury sustained by her. The learned Senior counsel asserts that the passengers who have been issued offer

¶88

letters have been asked to attend the negotiation. But the petitioner in W.P.(C).No.3731/2021, without appearing for the negotiation, filed this writ petition.

¶89

The learned Senior counsel further submits that, in case there is any further claim for the petitioner, she can point out the same with supporting materials at the time of negotiation, and that would be considered by the respondents. The learned Senior counsel also submits that the claims are considered in accordance with the priority with reference to the nature of injuries sustained by the passengers. It is stated that

¶90

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶91

¶92

the case of all the petitioners, who have submitted claims would be considered in accordance with the very same priority. It is also submitted that offer letters would be issued at the earliest,

¶93

and as and when such offer letters are issued, respective petitioners can appear before the respondents for negotiation further claims if any raised, would be considered on the basis of materials. It is also pointed out that the offer is made as without prejudice letter, and petitioners would be free to attend negotiation. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Senior counsel is recorded.

¶94

Both sides submit that a similar writ petition was already disposed of by Ext.P11 judgment dated 27.01.2021 in W.P. (C).No.27970/2020 with the following direction:-

¶95

“In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2^nd respondent to disburse the amount of 1,51,08,234/- in respect₹ of compensation offered in respect of the 2nd petitioner, to the petitioners forthwith, in accordance with law. If the petitioners are aggrieved/dissatisfied by the offer made by the 2nd respondent in respect of compensation for the death of Sharafudeen or for the injury of the 1^st petitioner, it is made clear that the petitioners will be at liberty to approach this Court or any other appropriate legal forum for redressal of their grievances, in accordance with law.”

¶96

These writ petitions are also disposed of, in the light of the afore said direction, making it clear that the petitioners

¶97

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶98

¶99

would be at liberty to approach this Court or any other appropriate legal forum for redressal of their grievances in accordance with law, in case they are dissatisfied with the

¶100

offer.

¶101

Sd/- P.V.ASHA JUDGE

¶102

VPK

¶103

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶104

¶105

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4872/2021

¶106

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶107

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C NO. 32550/10 DATED 20.07.2011 REPORTED IN 2011(3) KHC 199 (ABDUL SALAM VS. UNION OF INDIA).
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO. 1197/2011 DATED 25.08.2011 REPORTED IN 2011(3) KHC 761 (NATIONAL AVIATION COMPANY VS. ABDUL SALAM).
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE SPEECH DT. 30.04.2008 OF THE MINISTER FOR CIVIL AVIATION.
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE WORKING PAPER BY INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION DATED 27.09.2010.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE PREPARATORIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE WHICH LED TO THE MONTREAL CONVENTION DATED 14.5.1999.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN W.P.C NO. 23097/2011 DATED 5.9.2011.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN W.P.C NO. 23097/2011 AND WA NO. 1380/2011 DATED 29.09.2011.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE FILLED IN FORMAT GIVEN TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 17.10.2020.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT VOUCHER PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C NO. 27970/2020 DATED 27.01.2021 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.
EXHIBIT P11A	TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER VOUCHER IN THE

¶108

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶109

¶110

NAME OF AMEENA SHERIF.

¶111

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2914/2019 DT. 3/3/2020

¶112

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶113

EXHIBIT R2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE PRINTOUT OF THE EMAIL DATED 04.11.2020 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER

¶114

EXHIBIT R2(b) TRUE COPY OF THE PRINTOUT OF THE EMAIL DATED 11.12.2020 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ENCLOSURE

¶115

EXHIBIT R2(c) TRUE COPY OF THE PRINTOUT OF THE NEWS ARTICLE DATED 08.08.2020 PUBLISED BY REUTERS ON ITS WEBSITE

¶116

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶117

¶118

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3506/2021

¶119

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶120

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.32550/10 DATED 20.7.2011 REPORTED IN 2011 (3) KHC 199 (ABDUL SALAM VS. UNION OF INDIA). EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1197/2011 DATED 25.8.2011 REPORTED IN 2011 (3) KHC 761 (NATIONAL AVIATION COMPANY VS. ABDUL SALAM). EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE SPEECH DATED 30.4.2008 OF THE MINISTER FOR CIVIL AVIATION. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE WORKING PAPER BY INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION DATED 27.9.2010. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE PREPARATORIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE WHICH LED TO THE MONTREAL CONVENTION DATED 14.5.1999. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN WP(C) NO.23097/2011 DATED 5.9.2011. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.23097/2011 AND WA NO.1380/2011 DATED 29.9.2011. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE FILLED IN FORMAT GIVEN TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 19.10.2020. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT VOUCHER PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27970/2020 DATED 27.1.2021 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶121

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶122

¶123

EXHIBIT P11(A) TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER VOUCHER IN THE NAME OF AMEENA SHERIF. EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.2914/2019 DATED 3.3.2020.

¶124

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶125

¶126

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3536/2021

¶127

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶128

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 32550/2010 DATED 20.07.2011 REPORTED IN 2011(3) KHC 199(ABDUL SALAM VS. UNION OF INDIA) EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO. 1197/2011 DATED 25.08.2011 REPORTED IN 2011(3) KHC 761 (NATIONAL AVIATION COMPANY VS. ABDUL SALAM) EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE SPEECH DATED 30.04.2008 OF THE MINISTER FOR CIVIL AVIATION. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE WORKING PAPER BY INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION DATED 27.09.2010. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE PREPARATORIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE WHICH LED TO THE MONTREAL CONVENTION DATED 14.05.1999. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.23097/2011 DATED 5.09.2011. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.23097/2011 DATED 29.09.2011. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE FILLED IN FORMAT GIVEN TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 22.12.2020. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT VOUCHER PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND HANDED OVER TO ONE OF THE CLAIMANTS FOR SIGNATURE. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDIAL RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27970/2020 DATED 27.01.2021 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶129

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶130

¶131

EXHIBIT P11(A) TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER VOUCHER IN THE NAME OF AMEENA SHERIF. EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2914/2019 DATED 3/3/2020.

¶132

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶133

¶134

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3681/2021

¶135

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶136

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.32550/10 DATED 20.7.2011 REPORTED IN 2011 (3) KHC 199 (ABDUL SALAM VS. UNION OF INDIA).
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1197/2011 DATED 25.8.2011 REPORTED IN 2011 (3) KHC 761 (NATIONAL AVIATION COMPANY VS. ABDUL SALAM).
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE TEXT OF THE SPEECH DATED 30.4.2008 OF THE MINISTER FOR CIVIL AVIATION.
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE WORKING PAPER BY INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION DATED 27.9.2010.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE PREPARATORIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE WHICH LED TO THE MONTREAL CONVENTION DATED 14.5.1999.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN WP(C) NO.23097/2011 DATED 5.9.2011.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.23097/2011 AND W.A.NO.1380/2011 DATED 29.9.2011.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE FILLED IN FORMAT GIVEN TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28.12.2020.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT VOUCHER PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)27970/2020 DATED 27.1.2021 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.
EXHIBIT P11(A)	TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER VOUCHER IN THE NAME OF AMEENA SHERIF.

¶137

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶138

¶139

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.2914/2019 DATED 3.3.2020.

¶140

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶141

¶142

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3731/2021

¶143

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶144

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE WP(C)NO.32550/10 IN 2011 (3) KHC 1 OF INDIA)	JUDGMENT IN DATED 20/7/2011 REPORTED 99 (ABDUL SALAM VS. UNION
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE NO.1197/2011 DATE 2011 (3) KHC 761 VS. ADBUL SALAM).	JUDGMENT IN WA D 25.8.2011 REPORTED IN (NATIONAL AVIATION COMPANY
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE 30/4/2008 OF THE AVIATION.	TEXT OF THE SPEECH DT. MINISTER FOR CIVIL
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE INTERNATIONAL CIV DATED 27.9.2010.	WORKING PAPER BY IL AVIATION ORGANIZATION
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE PREPARATORIES IN CONFERENCE WHICH CONVENTION DATED	RELEVANT PORTION OF THE THE INTERNATIONAL LED TO THE MONTREAL 14/5/199.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE NO.23097/2011 DAT	ORDER IN WP(C) ED 5/9/2011.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE WP(C).NO.23097/20 DATED 29/9/2011.	COMMON JUDGMENT IN 11 AND W.A.NO.1380/2011
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE THE 2ND RESPONDEN	FILLED IN FORMAT GIVEN TO T DATED 19.10.2020
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE PREPARED BY THE 2	SETTLEMENT VOUCHER ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONER.	MEDICAL RECORDS OF THE
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPY OF THE WP(C).27970/2020 HON'BLE COURT.	JUDGMENT IN DATED 27.1.2021 BY THIS
EXHIBIT P11 (A)	TRUE COPY OF THE OF AMEENA SHERIF.	OFFER VOUCHER IN THE NAME

¶145

WP(C).No.4872 OF 2021 & Conn. Cases

¶146

¶147

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.2914/2019 DT. 3/3/2020. EXHIBIT R(2) TRUE COPY OF THE WITHOUT PREJUDICE OFFER MADE TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 02.02.2021

Rineesh, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rineesh, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.H. Pavithran Vs State of Kerala

B.S.Chandy Vs Venkatesapathy S., IAS

C.H.Pavithran Vs State of Kerala

Ashraf Kappumala Vs Union of India

Jayamol Vs Union of India

Ashraf Athalan Vs Union of India