B.S.Chandy v. Venkatesapathy S., IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt case under WP(C) 19643/2019. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the judgment was complied with, and the Court closed the contempt case on the same day as admission.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed upon submission that the impugned judgment was complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Con.Case(C).No.219 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 19643/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.219 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 19643/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19643/2019(E) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
1 B.S.CHANDY, AGED 62 YEARS, RTD. WORKER (HG), KERALA WATER AUTHORITY , VELLAYAMBALAM, RESIDING AT SANTHI BHAVAN, MULLELAVINMOODU, ARUVIKARA P O, THIRUVANANTNAPURAM.
2 B SUDHAKARAN, RTD VEHICLE INSPECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, VELLAYAMBALAM, RESIDING AT AJITHBHAVAN, VATTIYOORKAVU, KODUNGANOOR P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the relief given in the main writ petition was complied with and the contempt case should be closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.S.CHANDY
- petitioner
B SUDHAKARAN
- petitioner
A RAJ KUMAR
- respondent
VENKATESAPATHY S.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court