The High Court of Kerala dismissed a writ petition because it was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel. This was a status dismissal without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 11TH BHADRA,
1943
WP(C) NO. 2919 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
AJIKUMAR A.N., G-17, KSEB QUARTERS, KSEB COLONY, CHITHIRAPURAM
BY ADV SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
BY ADV SRI.N.RAPHY RAJ, SC, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED
SMT.PRINCY XAVIER GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
W.P.(C) No.2919 of 2013
W.P.(C) No.2919 of 2013
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
YKB
AJIKUMAR A.N.
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER & PROJECT MANAGER (PES)
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
