Disposed

Shareekhath M. v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC2 Nov 2021WP(C)/23857/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition concerning service regularisation in the Education Department, the Court directed the First Respondent to consider the petitioner's pending revision petition within two months after providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and third respondent.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the First Respondent to consider Ext.P2 revision petition within two months after hearing the parties.

Shareekhath M. Vs State of Kerala — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 2^ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1943

¶5

WP(C) NO. 23857 OF 2021

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

SHAREEKHATH M.

¶8

AGED 34 YEARS LPST, AMLP SCHOOL, INDIANOOR, MALAPPURAM - 676503.

¶9

BY ADVS. AUGUSTINE JOSEPH K.S.ROCKEY TONY AUGUSTINE GEORGE RENOY

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

¶12

2 ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM - 676 519.

¶13

3 THE MANAGER AMLP SCHOOL, INDIANOOR, MALAPPURAM - 676503.

¶14

OTHER PRESENT:

¶15

GP BIJOY CHANDRAN

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

WP(C) NO. 23857 OF 2021

¶18

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

The petitioner was appointed in a leave vacancy from 02.06.2008 to 04.06.2010. While continuing in the leave vacancy, he was appointed to an established additional vacancy on 01.06.2009. Thereafter, approval was sought pursuant to G.O.(P)No.4/2021/G.Edn dated 06.02.2021. The petitioner filed revision petition to approve his service with effect from 01.06.2009. Lamenting that the above revision which is pending before the first respondent has not been taken up and considered, the petitioner has approached this court.

¶21

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition itself with a direction to the first respondent shall take up Ext.P2 revision petition, consider it and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a

¶22

WP(C) NO. 23857 OF 2021

¶23

¶24

copy of this judgment, after giving a reasonable opportunity

¶25

of being heard to the petitioner and third respondent, either physically or online. The authorities shall deem that necessary bond has been executed under

¶26

G.O.(P)No.10/10/G.Edn dated 12.01.2010.

¶27

Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE

¶30

R.AV

¶31

WP(C) NO. 23857 OF 2021

¶32

¶33

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23857/2021

¶34

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶35

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 01.06.2009 ALONG WITH THE ENDORSEMENT OF APPROVAL. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 04.10.2021 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Shareekhath M. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shareekhath M. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Musthafa T.T. Vs Abdul Sajeem S

Xavier Sixon P.M. Vs Kerala State Housing Board Represented by Its Secretary

Lenin. K.V. Vs Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee

C.N. Chinnammal Vs Vaikom Municipality

V.Suresh Vs Kerala Small Industries Development Corporation

The Corporate Manager Vs State of Kerala