Allowed

P. Saidalavi v. Union of India

Kerala HC11 Nov 2021WP(C)/22433/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court declared that land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as no award was made within two years of the declaration. Consequently, the writ petitions challenging these proceedings were disposed of while leaving other contentions open.

What did the court decide?

Declared that acquisition proceedings shown in Serial No. 77 of Ext.P5 have lapsed and the remainder of the writ petitions disposed of accordingly.

P. Saidalavi Vs Union of India — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 11^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1943

¶5

WP(C) NO. 20836 OF 2009

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

P.M. PUSHPARAJ, 'DEVAPRIYA', EAST NADAKKAVU, P.M. KUTTY ROAD, KOZHIKODE.

¶8

BY ADVS. SRI. A. SUDHI VASUDEVAN SRI. JOSE JONES JOSEPH SMT. C.G. PREETHA SMT. K. PUSHPAVATHI

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶11

2 THE TAHSILDAR (LA), KOZHIKODE.

¶12

3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE.

¶13

4 THE CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, KOZHIKODE.

¶14

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE & ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, NORTHERN RANGE, KOZHIKODE.

¶15

6 KUNJABDULLA HAJI S/O. AHAMMED VELUTHAPARAMBATH HOUSE, PURAMERI, KODANCHERY - 673 503.

¶16

7 ERANJOLLY ABDULLA S/O. MAMMI ERANJOLLI HOUSE, P.O. KODANCHERY, PURAMERI - 673 503.

¶17

8 ASHRAF S/O. AHAMMED HAJI, THAZHEKUNI, KODANCHERY VIA, PURAMERI - 673 503.

¶18

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶19

¶20

*ADDL. THE KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD. R9

¶21

*ADDL. THE CO-ORDINATOR, R10 KOZHIKODE CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, UNDER THE KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD,

¶22

*ARE IMPLEADED SUO MOTU VIDE ORDER DATED 24.09.2009.

¶23

BY ADVS. SRI. P.K.BEHANAN SRI. ZAKIR HUSSAIN, SC, KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD SRI. FAISAL – GP SRI. G. SANTHOSH KUMAR – SC, KOZHIKODE MUNICIPALITY

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.11.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C). NOS.17730/2013 AND 22433/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶26

¶27

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶28

PRESENT

¶29

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

¶30

THURSDAY, THE 11^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 17730 OF 2013

¶31

PETITIONER:

¶32

P.M. PUSHPARAJ DEVAPRIYA, EAST NADAKAVU, P.M. KUTTY ROAD, KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI. A. SUDHI VASUDEVAN (SR.) SRI. JONES JOSE JOSEPH SMT. K. PUSHPAVATHI

¶33

RESPONDENTS:

¶34

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001.

¶35

2 LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001.

¶36

3 SPECIAL THAHASILDAR (LA) KOZHIKODE CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, KOZHIKODE – 673 001.

¶37

4 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE – 673 001.

¶38

*ADDL. THE COORDINATOR

¶39

R5 KOZHIKODE CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE-20

¶40

*ADDL.R5 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 24.07.2013 IN I.A NO.10097/2013. SRI. ZAKIR HUSSAIN, SC, KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD SRI. FAISAL – GP SRI. G. SANTHOSH KUMAR, SC, KOZHIKODE MUNICIPALITY

¶41

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.11.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).20836/2009 AND 22433/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶42

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶43

¶44

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶45

PRESENT

¶46

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

¶47

THURSDAY, THE 11^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1943

¶48

WP(C) NO. 22433 OF 2013

¶49

PETITIONERS:

¶50

1 P. SAIDALAVI AGED 72 YEARS S/O.MOIDEEN KOYA, NABIAMANAM, PAROPADY, MARIKUNNU P. O., KOZHIKODE - 673 009. 2 KAUSALYA AGED 74 YEARS W/O. P. PRABHAKARAN (LATE), NANBIAMPUNAM HOUSE, P.O., KOZHIKODE – 673 012. 3 SAJEEV KUMAR AGED 42 YEARS S/O. V. CAHDRAN, POOLAKKAL HOUSE, MARIKUNNU P. O., CALICUT - 673 012. 4 RAJEEV P. AGED 40 YEARS S/O. V.CHANDRAN, POOKLAKKAL HOUSE, MARIKUNNU P. O., CALICUT - 673 012. 5 SIRAJUDHEEN P.M. AGED 32 YEARS S/O. P.M.SEETHI, VELLIMADUPARAMBU, MARIKUNNU P.O., CALICUT - 673 012. 6 DR.O.MUHAMMAD AGED 66 YEARS S/O. ABDULLA MUSALIAR, OTHAYOTH HOUSE, NAMBIAMANAM, PAROPADY, MARIKUNNU P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 009. 7 PRASEETHA KISHORE P. AGED 39 YEARS S/O. P.C.S. PANICKER, SREE SADANAM, PAROPADDY, MERIKUNNI P. O., CALICUT - 12.

¶51

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶52

¶53

8 HAMZAKOYA P. AGED 52 YEARS S/O. KOYASSAN KOYA, PANAKKAT HOUSE, KONOTT P. O., KUNNAMANGALAM, CALICUT - 673 571. 9 PREMANATHAN V. AGED 61 YEARS S/O. ACHUTHAN V., VELUTHARAMBATH, MARIKUNNU P.O., CALICUT - 673 012. 10 V. SUBRAMANIAN AGED 65 YEARS S/O. GOPALAN, SREEDEVIKA, NEAR CH COLONY, P. O. MARIKUNNU, CALICUT - 12. 11 V. SUNDARAN AGED 56 YEARS S/O. GOPALAN, PAREKATTIL HOUSE, PARAMBU, CALICUT - 12. 12 V. SURESH BABU AGED 53 YEARS S/O. V. GOPALAN, KUNNANOLI HOUSE, P.O., MARIKUNNU, CALICUT - 12. 13 A. KUNHIKAMMU AGED 40 YEARS S/O. A.ALI, AMMOTH, P.O. MARIKUNNU, KOZHIKODE. 14 K.P. SIVADASAN AGED 70 YEARS S/O. KARUPAN, NIJEESH VIHAR, P.O. MALAPARAMBA, CALICUT - 9. 15 T.T. JOSE AGED 44 YEARS S/O. T.V. JOSEPH, ROSE VILLA, PAROPPADY, KOZHZIKODE - 9. 16 P. RAVINDRAN AGED 63 YEARS S/O. PAYATHOTTATHIL HOUSE, PAROPADY, KOZHIKODE.

¶54

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶55

¶56

17 P. SASIDHARAN AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. PAYATHOTTATHIL HOUSE, PAROPADY, KOZHIKODE. 18 C. SIDHARTHAN AGED 63 YEARS S/O. CHERUTTY, CHOLAPURATH HOUSE, MALAPARAMBA, PAROPPADY, CALICUT. 19 JENSON MATHEW AGED 60 YEARS S/O. LATE C.V. MATHUKUTTY, CHEERANS HOUSE, MALAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE - 673 009. 20 K.P. SHAMEER KUMAR AGED 44 YEARS S/O. K.P. SHIVADASAN, NIJEESH VIHAR, MALAPARAMBA P. O., KOZHIKODE - 673 009. BY ADVS. SRI. S. AJITH PALAKKAD

¶57

RESPONDENTS:

¶58

1 THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, NO.1, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SERETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3 THE CHIEF ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 4 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (ROADS DIVISION), KOZHIKODE - 673 020. 5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

¶59

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶60

¶61

6 THE COORDINATOR KOZHIKODE CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, CALICUT - 673 020. 7 SABU K. PHILIP FORMER CO-ORDINATOR, KOZHIKODE CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, CALICUT - 673 001. 8 SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), KOZHIKODE CITY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, CALICUT - 673 001. 9 KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

¶62

SRI. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASG OF INDIA SRI. ZAKIR HUSSAIN, SC, KERALA ROAD FUND BOARD SRI. S. MANU SRI. FAISAL – GP

¶63

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.11.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).20836/2009 AND 17730/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶64

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶65

¶66

JUDGMENT

¶67

Since the issues involved in all the writ petitions are the same, they were posted together and are heard and disposed of by this common judgment.

¶68

W.P. (C) No. 17730 of 2013

¶69

The petitioner states that he is the owner of a non-residential building in a property having an extent of 1.50 cents comprised in Re. Sy Nos.1-371542 and 1-37-1509 located near Nadakavu East junction on the western side of ManachiraVellimadukunnu road, a portion of National Highway (NH-212). The petitioner is running an automobile spare parts shop in the said building.

¶70

The 3^rd respondent issued Ext.P4 notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894

¶71

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶72

¶73

(for short 'the Act') in relation to certain properties including the aforesaid property of the petitioner. Ext.P4 notification under Section 4 (1) was published

¶74

in the Kerala Gazette on 28.11.2011. Pursuant to that, Ext.P5 declaration under Section 6 (1) of the Act was issued by the 2^nd respondent on 20.04.2013 and the same was published in the Gazette on 24.04.2013.

¶75

This writ petition was filed on 15.07.2013 contending inter alia that there is no justification on the part of the 2^nd respondent to invoke the urgency clause under Section 17 of the Act and that the acquisition proceedings are vitiated by malafides. It is also contended that Ext.P5 declaration under Section 6 (1) was published after one year from the date of publication of Section 4 (1) notification and therefore the same is invalid in terms of Clause (ii) of the

¶76

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶77

¶78

proviso to Section 6 of the Act. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash Ext.P3 order issued under Section 17(4), Ext.P4 notification under Section 4(1) and Ext.P5 declaration under Section 6(1).

¶79

Respondents 3 and 5 have filed counter affidavits in the writ petition resisting the averments in the writ petition. No interim order was granted in the writ petition.

¶80

During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner filed I.A No.1 of 2021 to amend the writ petition. In the said interlocutory application, the petitioner states that, though Section 6 (1) declaration was published on 24.04.2013, no award

¶81

was made within two years from the date of publication of the declaration and therefore, the acquisition proceedings have lapsed. Accordingly, the petitioner has sought to incorporate a prayer to

¶82

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶83

¶84

declare that the entire proceedings for acquisition of the land in question shown as Serial No.77 in Ext.P5 declaration have lapsed and to interdict the respondents from proceeding further in pursuance of Exts.P3 to P5 in relation to his property. The contention of the petitioner is that, Ext.P5 declaration was published in the official gazette on 24.04.2013 and published i n Mathrubhumi Daily da ted 29.06.2013 and Deshabhimani Daily dated 21.06.2013 and public notice as mandated by Section 6 (2) was made at the office of Tahsildar on 29.06.2013 and at the concerned Village offices on 20.06.2013. According to Sri. Sudhi Vasudevan, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, since no award was passed by the 4^th respondent within a period of two years from the date of publication of Section 6(1) declaration, the entire acquisition

¶85

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶86

¶87

proceedings have lapsed in terms of Section 11A of the Act. It is also submitted by the Senior Counsel that there was no stay of proceedings pursuant to the declaration.

¶88

I.A No.1 of 2021 to amend the writ petition

¶89

was allowed on 03.11.2021 and the learned Government Pleader was asked to get instructions with regard to the prayer in the amended writ petition.

¶90

Today, when the matter came up for further consideration, the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that no award has been passed by the District Collector within the period of two years from the date of publication of the 6(1) declaration.

¶91

Section 11A of the Act reads as follows:

¶92

“11A.Period within which an award shall be made. - The Collector shall make an award under

¶93

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶94

¶95

section 11 within a period of two years from the date of the publication of the declaration and if no award is made within that period, the entire proceedings for the acquisition of the land shall lapse:

¶96

Provided that in a case where the said declaration has been published before the commencement of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984, the award shall be made within a period of two years from such commencement.

¶97

Explanation – In computing the period of two years referred to in this section, the period during which any action or proceeding to be taken in pursuance of the said declaration is stayed by an order of a Court shall be excluded.

¶98

Since no award has been passed with

¶99

respect to the property of the petitioner within a period of two years from the date of publication of declaration under Section 6(1), the acquisition

¶100

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶101

¶102

proceedings have lapsed. It is submitted that since there was no stay of proceedings in pursuance of the declaration under Section 6 (1), the provisions under the Explanation to Section 11A has no application. Accordingly, it is declared that the entire proceedings for acquisition of the land of the petitioner shown as Serial No.77 in Ext.P5 declaration have lapsed.

¶103

The learned Government Pleader submits tha t, steps are being taken to issue a ne w notification under Section 11 (1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. This submission is recorded. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that permission may be given to the petitioner to raise objection to the fresh notification with direction to the respondents to consider the same. It is too premature for the

¶104

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶105

¶106

petitioner to make such a prayer at this point of time.

¶107

This writ petition is disposed of in the light of the provisions under Section 11 A of the Act. All other contentions raised by the parties in this writ petition are left open.

¶108

W.P. (C) No.20836 of 2009

¶109

The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that, in the light of the judgment in W.P. (C) No.17730/2013, this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶110

W.P. (C) No.22433 of 2013

¶111

The petitioners in this writ petition challenge the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of their properties pursuant to Ext.P10 notification under Section 4(1) of the Act (Ext.P4 in W.P.(C) No.17730/2013) on various grounds. Sri. S. Ajith, the

¶112

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013 16

¶113

learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no award has been passed in respect of the properties of the petitioners within the time stipulated under Section 11A of the Act and that he adopts the argument of the learned senior counsel for the petitioner in W.P. (C) No.17730/2013 and the writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the judgment in W.P. (C) No.17730/2013. Since no award is passed in respect of the properties of the petitioners within the time stipulated under Section 11A of the Act, the acquisition proceedings in respect of their properties pursuant to Ext.P10 have lapsed. With this declaration and leaving open all other contentions raised by the parties, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶114

Sd/-

¶115

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE

¶116

SPR

¶117

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶118

¶119

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17730/2013

¶120

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-

¶121

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH SHOWING THE IMPUGNED ALIGNMENT OF MANANCHIRA – VELLIMADUKUNNIU ROAD.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DATED 30.04.2012 DILED BEFORE THE COURT OF ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL JUDGE KOZHIKODE IN CRIME NO.VC 01/2012 NRK.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTED 14.11.2011 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 17 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
EXHIBIT P4	A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 26.11.2011 ISSUED U/S 4(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT BY 3RD RESPONDENT ANBD PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 28.11.2011.
EXHIBIT P4(a)	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 26.11.2011 ISSUED U/S 4(A) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT AND PUBLISHED MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 28.11.2011.
EXHIBIT P5	A TRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION DATED 20.04.2013 ISSUED U/S 6(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT BY 3RD RESPONDENT AND PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICAITON DATED 30.07.2013 SUBMITTED BY ME BEFORE THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KACHERI AMSOM AND DESOM OF KOZHIKODE.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 1.8.2013 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER KACHERI.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICAITON DATED 31.07.2013 SUBMITTED BY ME UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶122

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶123

¶124

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 19.08.2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ACCOMPANIED BY THE NOTICE DATED 28.04.2012 AS TO THE SUBSTANCE OF SEC 4 (1) NOTIFICATION AND THE DETAILS OF THE PUBLICATION OF THE NOTICE IN THE NOTICE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OFFICE.

¶125

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN SHOWING THE RE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROAD PROPOSED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11/10/2021 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 TO SR.C.P.SOMAN.

¶126

EXHIBIT P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION U/S.6 OF THE ACT PUBLISHED IN THE KERALA GAZETTE DATED 24/04/2013 BEARING THE ENDORSEMENTS THEREON.

¶127

RESPONDENTS'S EXHIBITS: NIL.

¶128

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶129

¶130

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22433 OF 2013

¶131

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-

¶132

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF MALAPARAMBA-VELLIMADUKUNNU STRETCH OF HN-212.
EXHIBIT P1(a)	TRUE COPY OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF RAMANATTUKARA BY-PASS ROAD.
EXHIBIT P1(b)	TRUE COPY OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF MANORAMA DAILY DATED 05/11/2012.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF G.O.(RT) NO.1523/2008/PWD DATED 08/09/2008 ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF G.O.(RT) NO.11887/2008/PWD DATED 14/11/2008 ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 12/07/2012 SENT BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT (WITHOUT THE DOCUMENTS APPENDED TO IT).
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE FIR LODGED AGAINST THE 8TH RESPONDENT BY THE VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, NR, KOZHIKODE, POLICE STATION.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 23/08/2012 OF THE 6TH RESPONDENT ALONG WITH APPLICATION DATED 30/7/2012 UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF G.O.(MS) NO.34/2009/PWD DATED 18/06/2009.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONN (RFQ) ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF INIDA (MORT & H).

¶133

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶134

¶135

EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 07/09/2012 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHUMI NEWSPAPER ON 28/12/2011.
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPIES OF NOTICES DATED 28/04/2012 MADE U/S.4 (1) OF THE ACT AND SERVED ON THE PEOPLE OF MALAPARAMBA VELLIMADUKUNNU AREA BY 9TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P12	TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 05/07/2012 PREFERRED BY MR.JOSE TO THE 9TH RESPSONDENT.
EXHIBIT P13	TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 02/07/2012 PREFERRED BY THE 19TH PETITIONER HEREIN TO THE 8TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P14	TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 04/07/2012 PREFERRED BY THE 19TH PETITIONER HEREIN TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P15	TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 862012 ISSUED BY THE 8TH RESPONDENT TO 19TH PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P16	TRUE COPY OF MEMORANDUM DATED 16/06/2012 SUBMITTED TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT BY THE “VELLIMADUKUNNU- MALAPARAMBA ROAD AREA PURA SAMITHI.”
EXHIBIT P17	TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23/06/2012 SUBMITTED TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT BY THE VELLIMADUKUNNU- MALAPRAMBA ROAD AREA OOURA SAMITHI.
EXHIBIT P18	TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19/07/2012 SENT BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P19	TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.37518/2009 DATED 30/05/2012.
EXHIBIT P20	TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 11/10/2012 BY 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 9TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P21	TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 07/11/2012 SENT BY THE 9TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

¶136

WP(C).No.20836 OF 2009, 17730 & 22433 of 2013

¶137

¶138

EXHIBIT P22 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 08/10/2012 SENT BY THE 9TH RESPONDENT TO THE 20TH PETITIONER.

¶139

EXHIBIT P23 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 08/11/2012 SENT BY THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

¶140

RESPONDENTS'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

P. Saidalavi v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Saidalavi v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Thayyaba H., Vs University of Kerala

Indukumar V.S Vs State of Kerala

Thankamony Varghese Vs Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner

Sivan.S. Vs the Tahsildar, Chittoor Taluk

P.M.Pushparaj Vs State of Kerala

P.M.Pushparaj Vs State of Kerala and Others