Mohammed Rafi v. Nodal Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition stating no desire to prosecute the matter further. The court allowed the petition and closed it on the same day.
What did the court decide?
Allowed the writ petition and closed the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 17695 OF 2016
PETITIONER:
MOHAMMED RAFI,AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, INTERNET DREAMS CAFE, KAJA COMPLEX, R.S.ROAD, ALUVA, RESIDING AT ARAKKATH HOUSE, 4TH MILE, ERUMATHALA PO, ALUVA-683 112.
BY ADV SMT.SHAMEENA SALAHUDHEEN
RESPONDENTS:
1 NODAL OFFICER, BHARATI AIRTEL LIMITED, N.H.BYEPASS, KUNDANOOR JUNCTION, MARADU PO, KOCHI-682004.
2 THE PERMANENT LOK ADALATH (FOR PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES) GROUND FLOOR, ADR CENTRE, DISTRICT COURT ANNEX PREMISES, KALOOR, KOCHI-682017, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOHAMMED RAFI
- respondent
NODAL OFFICER, BHARATI AIRTEL LIMITED
- respondent
THE PERMANENT LOK ADALATH (FOR PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court