The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without detailed reasoning. No substantive legal proposition or decision of general application is provided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 6TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 16025 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
MARYKUTTY SAMUEL AGED 65 YEARS W/O SAMUEL VARGHESE, JOBI SADANAM, ATTACHACKAL P.O.KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN689 645.
BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER:SRI.BIMAL.K.NATH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
WP(C) NO. 16025 OF 2021
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN
JUDGE
rsr
MARYKUTTY SAMUEL
THE SECRETARY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
SATHISH NINAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
