Pooja Shajilal v. Rahul
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenging video CD analysis delay was disposed of by the Court finding no need for further directions based on the standing counsel's submission regarding the proper authority.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 8TH ASWINA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 15522 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
POOJA SHAJILAL
D/O. SINDHU, SREELAYAMVEEDU, MADATHILKARAZHMA MURI, OACHIRA P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY PIN - 690518.
BY ADV M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENTS:
1 RAHUL, S/O. RAJENDRAN, AMMATTOOR VADAKKATHIL, MADATHILKARAZHMA, OACHIRA P.O, KARUNAGAPPALLY, PIN - 690518.
2 CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMETN OF IMAGING TECHNOLOGY (CDIT) REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, CHITHRANJALI HILLS, THIRUVALLAM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA – 695027.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
POOJA SHAJILAL
- respondent
RAHUL
- respondent
CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMETN OF IMAGING TECHNOLOGY
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court