Anil v. Savija
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court, in a special leave petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, dismissed the matter as not pressed due to a settlement arrived at between the parties, resulting in the quashing of the earlier operation of the Family Court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 8TH ASWINA, 1943 OP (FC) NO. 329 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.578/2016 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD
PETITIONER/S:
ANIL, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, ANITHA NIVAS, NEAR G.L.P.SCHOOL, KANJIKODE, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 621 (REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER C.RAMAKRISHNA NAIR, AGED 80 YEARS, S/O.ACHUTHAN NAIR, ANITHA NIVAS, KANJIKODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT).
BY ADVS. JACOB SEBASTIAN SRI.K.V.WINSTON
RESPONDENT/S:
SAVIJA, D/O.VIJAYAN, ASHIRVAD, SREENAGAR, POTTAKULAM, KAVILPPAD, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ANIL
- respondent
SAVIJA
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court