Disposed

P.K.Anto v. the Irinjalakuda Peoples Co-Operative Bank

Kerala HC10 Feb 2021WP(C)/1476/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking direction to dispose of a pending arbitration case, the court held that the petitioners need not move further. It directed the authority to dispose of Ext.P10 within four months based on its nature and age.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to dispose of Ext.P10 (Arbitration Case) within four months of receipt of this judgment.

P.K.Anto Vs the Irinjalakuda Peoples Co-Operative Bank — Kerala HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 21ST MAGHA,1942

¶5

WP(C).No.1476 OF 2020(H)

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

1 P.K.ANTO PULIYANI HOUSE, ALOOR.P.O., KALLETTUMKARA, VIA IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR.

¶8

2 P.R.MARYKUTTY, PULIYANI HOUSE, ALOOR.P.O., KALLETTUMKARA, VIA IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR.

¶9

BY ADVS. SHRI.MATHEW K.T. SHRI.GEORGE K.V.

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 THE IRINJALAKUDA PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.156 IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680121, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶12

2 THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF THE IRINJALAKUDA PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.156, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680121, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.

¶13

3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOL, THRISSUR-680003.

¶14

4 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), MUKUNDAPURAM, IRINJALAKUDA, PIN-680121.

¶15

SR.GP K.P HARISH

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

WP(C).No.1476 OF 2020(H) 2

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

The limited prayer sought by the petitioners is for a direction to the third and fourth respondents to dispose of Ext.P10 ARC pending before the authority. Notice served on the respondents, who have not appeared.

¶20

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned senior Government Pleader.

¶21

Having considered the limited prayer sought

¶22

by the petitioner herein, I am inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition itself, having regard to the fact that Ext.P10 is of the year 2018, before whom the matter is pending, dispose of Ext.P10 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment or from completion of service of notice on the parties whichever is later.

¶23

WP(C).No.1476 OF 2020(H) 3

¶24

Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE

¶27

R.AV

¶28

WP(C).No.1476 OF 2020(H)

¶29

¶30

APPENDIX

¶31

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶32

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING REPORT RECEIVED FROM DOCTOR DATED 16.2.2017.

¶33

EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 3.1.2018.

¶34

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 16.1.2018.

¶35

EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 23.1.2018 TO THE 2ND PETITIONER.

¶36

EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 1.2.2018 TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

¶37

EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 14.2.2018.

¶38

EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 14.2.2018.

¶39

EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE 4THRESPONDENT VIDE LETTER NO.R.2897/UK/2017 DATED 28.2.2018 TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

¶40

EXHIBIT P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.4.2018 RECEIVED FROM THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT WPC.13585/2018.

¶41

WP(C).No.1476 OF 2020(H) 5

¶42

EXHIBIT P10 A TRUE COPY OF ARBITRATION CASE WITH CHALLAN FOR RS.5000/- FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 10.6.2018.

¶43

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS NIL

P.K.Anto v. the Irinjalakuda Peoples Co-Operative Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.K.Anto v. the Irinjalakuda Peoples Co-Operative Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purushothama Prabhu Vs Pattanakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. NO.1144

Kumar Vs the State of Kerala

Ibrahim Vs the Regional Transport Authority

Santha.a.S. Vs the Chirakkara Service Co-Operative Bank LTD.NO.1894

Fathima Suhara.M Vs the Regional Transport Authority

O.v.Appachen Vs the Dairy Extension Officer