Kumar v. the State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court declared a Writ Petition closed as infructuous following a recorded auction of the petitioner's licenses, dismissing all Interim Applications.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is closed as infructuous and all Interim Applications are closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 20TH MAGHA,1942
WP(C).No.720 OF 2021(L)
PETITIONER/S:
KUMAR
AGED 38 YEARS S/O.PERIYASWAMY, RESIDING AT ALAKKAL HOUSE, THOTTUMUGHAM P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
BY ADVS. SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR DEVI PADMA
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
- 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, EXCISE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kumar
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
The Commissioner of Excise
- respondent
The Deputy Commissioner of Excise
- respondent
The Circle Inspector of Excise
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court