The petitioner argued that the writ petition became infructuous due to subsequent events.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021/22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 14360 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
SATHYADEVAN K., ARA-88, KRISHNALAYAM, MUNDAKAL EAST,
KOLLAM, PIN-691 001.
BY ADVS. S.SANTHOSH KUMAR ANJANA.S.SANTHOSH P.LISSY JOSE
RESPONDENTS:
1 KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 010, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BY ADV BIJILY JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C)No.14360/2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of December, 2021
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due
to subsequent events, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE
ncd/13.12.2021
SATHYADEVAN K.
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
N. NAGARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
