Jose Paul v. Paul
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a Review Petition challenging a judgment that did not examine witness animus regarding a settlement deed's attestation, relying on a prior order (F.A.O(RO) No.7/2020).
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 3RD KARTHIKA, 1943
RP NO. 676 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 11/7/2018 IN RSA 227/2006 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
JOSE PAUL, S/O PAUL,
PAYYAMPILLI VEETTIL,
ALAPURAMKARA, ELANJI VILLAGE,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686665.
BY ADVS.
C.RAJENDRAN
B.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN
R.S.SREEVIDYA
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
PAUL, S/O PAUL,
PAYYAMPILLI VEETTIL, ALAPPURAMKARA, ELANJI VILLAGE,
PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM-686665.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Review Petition seeking to challenge the non-consideration of witness attestation in a settlement deed is sustainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JOSE PAUL
- respondent
PAUL
Coram
P. SOMARAJAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court