Jeinuladeen v. Faujunneesa
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant challenges an interim order preventing encumbrance on partition property via the Kerala Land Reforms Act. The court held such protection is permissible and dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed in limine against the interim order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 20TH ASWINA, 1943
FAO NO. 67 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29/6/2021 I.A.874/2021 IN F.D.I.A.NO.1115/2019 IN OS 400/2005 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHITTUR,
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/3RD DEFENDANT:
JEYINULADEEN, S/O NABEESAUMMA, AGED 52 YEARS, VAKKILMADA, VANDITHAVALAM, PATTANCHERY VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT
BY ADVS. RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY K.V.ANTONY K.VIJINA ARUL MURALIDHARAN
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
FAUJUNNEESA, W/O KASIM, D/O SEITHAPPA RAVUTHAR, AGED 54 YEARS, VAKKILMADA, AYYAPPANKAVIL, PATTANCHERY AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 532
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim order passed during final decree proceedings to protect property from encumbrance before partition is maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jeyinuladeen
- respondent
Faujunnesea
Coram
P. Somarajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court