The review petition is filed by the respondents in W.P.(C) No. 30393 of 2016 seeking to review the judgment dated 03.11.2016, whereby this Court found that the writ petitioners have not received the amount in the land acquisition proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called 'Act, 1894), even though the possession of the property of the writ petitioners were taken pursuant to the LAC Nos. 39/2006, 40/2006 and 45/2006 and the amounts were deposited before the Reference Court on 10.05.2007. However reference files were returned by the Reference Court holding that there is a difference in the extent of property acquired and the documents produced and hence, the reference is returned to the Land Acquisition Officer concerned. Similar and typical orders were passed in all the above land acquisition cases and the orders are apparently dated 08.10.2014 and it was accordingly that a direction was issued to the third review petitioner i.e., the Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Kochi Refineries Ltd., Tripunithura. Apparently, acquisitions were made on the basis of the requisition made by the Chief Executive Officer, INFOPARK,
