Benny Mathew v. Chandy
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed due to out-of-court settlement. Vacated the interim injunction that was previously passed in the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed; interim injunction vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1943 RFA NO. 624 OF 2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.03.2011 IN O.S NO.264/2009 OF SUBODINATE JUDGES COURT, PALA.
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
BENNY MATHEW, S/O MATHAI, MUDAKKALIL HOUSE,PULIYANNOOR KARA AND VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKKUZHY
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
CHANDY,
S/O.THOMMAN, ELAVUNGAL, VALLICHIRA KARA AND VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK 686 575.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BENNY MATHEW
- respondent
CHANDY
Coram
MARY JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court