Regular first appeal challenging a final decree in a suit disposed without prejudice.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to raise contentions before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 18TH SRAVANA, 1943
RFA NO. 136 OF 2018
IN CHALLENGE OF THE FINAL DECREE DATED 13.02.2015 IN OS NO.165/2005 OF
SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM
APPELLANT/4TH DEFENDANT:
RAVICHANDRAN K.N., AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. KALAM KALLINGAL NARAYANA GUPTHAN,PULLUNDASSERY AMSOM, DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3 & 5 TO 9:
S/O. MANIKKANDATH CHUNDEKKATT LATE RAMAKRISHNA GUPTHAN,PULLUNDASSERY AMSOM, AZHIYANNUR P.O.-678 633, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2 CHANDRAMOHAN, AGED AROUND 61 YEARS, S/O. MANIKKANDATH CHUNDEKKATT LATE RAMAKRISHNA GUPTHAN,PULLUNDASSERY AMSOM, AZHIYANNUR P.O.,-678633. OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
09.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.F.A.NO.136 of 2018
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9th day of August, 2021
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the
appellant, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to raise contentions if any, before appropriate forum.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
MJL
RAVICHANDRAN K.N.
GOPINATHAN
CHANDRAMOHAN
MALATHI BALAKRISHNAN
LEELA SUBRAMANIAM
THE SECRETARY, KADAMBAZHIPURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
MARY JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
