This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 1ST ASWINA, 1943
RFA NO. 288 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.03.2017 IN FDIA 1044/2014 IN OS 145/2011 OF SUB COURT, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2/DEFENDANT NO.2:
RADHA.M.K AGED 65 YEARS D/O KELAPPAN, SWASTHAM, ARATHY HOUSE, KAIRALI NAGAR, MOOLAPPADAM ROAD, KALAMASSERY POST, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN-682 021.
BY ADVS.
SATHYAN P. THAMPY SMT.K.LASITHA
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANTS NO.1 AND 3 TO 7:
1 MENAKANDIYIL KUNHIRAMAN AGED 74 YEARS,
S/O KELAPPAN, PENSIONER, KETHARAM HOUSE, PURAMERI AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673 103.
2 MANEKKANDIYIL JANOOTTY AGED 70 YEARS S/O. KELAPPAN, SWASTHAM, MATAKKAL HOSUE, VALAYAM AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673 103..
3 MANEKKANDIYIL LEELA AGED 61 YEARS S/O KELAPPAN, SWASTHAM, EDVATH HOUSE, EDACHERRY AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673 103.
4 CHITTANGARI LALITHA ALIAS KAUSU AGED 61 YEARS S/O KUNHIRAMAN, SWASTHAM, RAM NIVAS HOUSE, VELLUR AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673 103.
RFA NO. 288 OF 2019
2
5 SUJITH AGED 45 YEARS S/O. BALAN, DOCUMENT WRITTER, RAM NIVAS HOUSE, VELLUR AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673103.
6 SAJITH AGED 41 YEARS
S/O. BALAN, BANK CLERK, RAM NIVAS HOUSE, VELLUR AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673 103
7 VIJITH AGED 39 YEARS S/O. BALAN, COMPUTER WORK, RAM NIVAS HOUSE, VELLUR AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-673103.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY R2 BY ADV. SHAJNA FIROZ
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA NO. 288 OF 2019
3
JUDGMENT
The appellant and the counsel remained absent. There was no representation. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE
SPV
Radha M.K
Menakandiyl Kunhiraman
P. Somarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
