Varghese v. V.S. Satheesh
Case brief
What is this about?
In an appeal and cross objection, the High Court of Kerala dismissed both matters as the parties had executed a compromise excluding the decree satisfaction, resulting in a short order.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of appeal and cross objection based on party compromise; no refund of court-fee ordered.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 31ST BHADRA, 1943
RFA NO. 199 OF 2010
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16/11/2009 IN OS 429/2005 OF
PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF/COUNTER CLAIM DEFENDANT:
1 VARGHESE, AGED 60 YEARS, BUILDING CONTRACTOR, S/O.VAZHAPPILLY DEVASSY, KALLOOR VADAKKUM MURI VILLAGE, CHERUVALLUR DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. (DIED)
ADDITIONAL A2 AND A3 IMPLEADED
A2 VIJI BENOY, AGED 46 YEARS, W/O.GEORGE BEJOY, ELAMPLASSERY HOUSE, PANAMBILLY ROAD, KINFRA PARK P.O, KORATTY ,PIN 680 309.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Varghese
- respondent
Satheesh
Coram
P. Somarajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court