Sunil Kumar C.v., v. Seena
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition challenging eviction order under Rent Control Act dismissed as not pressed because parties settled and tenant already vacated premises.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1943 R.C.REV. NO.4 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.10.2018 IN R.C.A.NO.149 OF 2015 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY (ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE–I), THALASSERY AND THE ORDER DATED 31.08.2015 IN R.C.P.NO.283 OF 2014 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT (PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF), KANNUR
REVISION PETITIONER:
SUNIL KUMAR C.V., S/O KUNHIRAMAN, CHOLAVALAPPIL, KOOTTARATHUMPARA, AZHIKODE, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. P.U.SHAILAJAN SRI.M.SURESH KUMAR SRI.V.SREEJITH SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sunil Kumar C.V.
- respondent
Seena
Coram
Anil K. Narendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court