Sushand v. Seena
Case brief
What is this about?
A tenant filed a revision petition contesting the eviction order against him. The High Court dismissed the revision after recording that the parties had settled the matter and the tenant had vacated the premises.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as not pressed on the ground of settlement and vacation of premises.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1943
R.C.REV. NO.120 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.09.2018 IN R.C.A.NO.151 OF 2015 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY (ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE–I), THALASSERY AND THE ORDER DATED 31.08.2015 IN R.C.P.NO.285 OF 2014 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT (PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF),
KANNUR
REVISION PETITIONER:
SUSHAND, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O KRISHNAN, VEELLAN VEEDU, THALIKKAVU, KANNUR.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sushand
- respondent
Seena
Coram
Anil K. Narendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court