In the light of the facts aforenoted, we are of the view that the Family Court require to consider the objection of the petitioner as against conditional attachment at the first instance. It is only after adverting to the objection, the attachment can be made absolute. Thereafter, if attachment is made out absolute, the consideration of an application under Order XXXVIII Rule 9 of the CPC would arise for consideration. The procedure adopted by the Family court according to us is irregular. Though the order dated 10.9.2021 is not under challenge, we exercise our supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution and interfere with such order for the reason that grave irregularity has been committed by the Family Court passing such order on 10.09.2021 without adverting to the objection raised by the parties. By a cryptic order, attachment has been made absolute. We, therefore, set aside the order dated 10.09.2021. We also set aside the impugned order dated 30.03.2021 under Order XXXVIII Rule 9 of the CPC. We direct the Family Court to pass a reasoned order
