Krishnakumari v. Thilakan
Case brief
What is this about?
The matrimonial appeal filed by Krishna Kumari was dismissed as it was not pressed by the learned counsel for the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The application to condone delay and the appeal were dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 1ST ASWINA, 1943
MAT.APPEAL NO. 418 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.9.2017 IN OP 851/2009 OF FAMILY
COURT, KOLLAM
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
KRISHNAKUMARI, AGED 47, W/O.THILAKAN, THILAKALAYAM VEEDU, ELAMABALLOOR, KOLLAM.
BY ADV SRI.SAJU J PANICKER
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Krishnakumari
- respondent
Thilakan
- respondent
Ambika
- respondent
Suseela
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court