Suraj, v. Archana
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment modifies a Family Court order on interim custody. The High Court increased the petitioner's custody duration from one hour to five hours (11 am to 4 pm) but did not grant overnight custody.
What did the court decide?
Modified the Family Court order to grant petitioner custody from 11 am to 4 pm on 1st and 3rd Fridays; child to be returned to Court at 4 pm.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1942
OP (FC).No.25 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 346/2020 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD
PETITIONER:
SURAJ, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O RAJAN, KATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUZHALMANNAM POST, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 702.
BY ADV. SMT.K.S.SUMITHA
RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court order regarding interim custody of a five-year-old minor can be modified to grant overnight interaction to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SURAJ
- respondent
ARCHANA
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court