Nayana v. Sunilkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1943
OP (FC).No.246 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(HMA)NO.592/2019 OF FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL
PETITIONER/S:
NAYANA, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.SUNIL KUMAR, VAZHATHATTUVILA VEEDU, PERUNKUZHY, AZHOOR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 305.
BY ADV. SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA)
RESPONDENT/S:
SUNILKUMAR, S/O.DASAN, NANDANAM, PERUNKUZHY, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, AZHOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 305.
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP (FC).No.246/2021 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 30th day of March 2021
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
This original petition was filed for expeditious disposal of matter pending before the Family Court concerned. A Division Bench of this Court by the judgment dated 23.3.2021 in O.P.(FC) No.352/2020 and connected matters had given guidelines for disposal of such cases pending before the Family Court.
This original petition is disposed of in the light of the above judgment. The directions in the above judgment shall be scrupulously followed in this matter also.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
JUDGE
ln
OP (FC).No.246/2021 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION NO.OP(HMA) 592/2019 PENDING BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
Nayana
Sunilkumar
A.Muhamed Mustaque
Dr. Kauser Edappagath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court