Bindu v. Jojo
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed an original petition filed by the petitioner challenging an order of the Family Court. The petitioner sought to have the respondent's defence struck off for alleged failure to maintain. The High Court held there was no jurisdictional error warranting interference under Article 226. null
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1942
OP (FC).No.7 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2019 IN IA 1420/2019 IN OP 531/2016 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BINDU
AGED 43 YEARS W/O. KALLELI JOJO, THUMBAKODE DESOM, PARIYARAM VILLAGE, KANJIRAPPALLY P.O., CHALAKUDY TALUK, PIN-680 721
BY ADVS. SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. SRI.U.M.HASSAN SMT.P.PARVATHY SMT.SURYA P SHAJI SHRI.MANAS P HAMEED SHRI.GAUTHAM MOHAN H.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court erred in refusing to strike off the respondent's defence on grounds of alleged non-payment of maintenance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BINDU
- respondent
JOJO
Coram
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court