Shajeena v. Anshad
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a petition challenging an interim custody order. The Court held that an order granting interim custody of a minor child from father for a short period was correct and lacked any reason to interfere.
What did the court decide?
This original petition was hereby dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1942
OP (FC).No.133 OF 2020
AGAINST ORDER DATED 20.2.2020 IN EA 23/2020 IN EP 30/2019 IN GOP NO.1099/2017 OF THE FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA
PETITIONERS:
1 SHAJEENA
AGED 24 YEARS D/O.KURIAPPILLY ASHRAF, ANCHAPALAM DESOM, METHALA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN680669.
2 SAJITHA, AGED 52 YEARS W/O.KURIAPPILLY ASHRAF, ANCHAPALAM DESOM, METHALA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, PIN- 680669.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Family Court order granting interim custody of the child to the father for a short period.
Whether the challenge to the interim custody order was maintainable or merited reconsideration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shajeena
- petitioner
Sajitha
- respondent
Anshad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court