Bhavya S. v. Sujesh J.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismissed a petition challenging the Family Court's interim directive allowing the non-custodial father to video call the minor child weekly. The High Court found no infirmity in the order facilitating limited contact.
What did the court decide?
The petition challenging the Family Court order was dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1943
OP (FC).No.111 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.1564/2020 IN OPGW 745/2020 DATED 28.01.2021 OF FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER:
BHAVYA S. AGED 25 YEARS D/O. SUKUMARAN NAIR, ELAPPADIYIL HOUSE, NEAR AMEDA TEMPLE, MLA ROAD, UDAYAMPEROOR, PIN 682 307, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.V.PAULSON SRI.BIJU MARTIN
RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court order permitting video call interaction between the father and minor child suffers from any infirmity or illegality.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhavya S.
- respondent
Sujesh J.
Coram
A.Muhamad Mustaque
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court