Indirabhai, v. Rajeevan
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 1ST POUSHA,
1943
TR.P(C) NO. 547 OF 2021
OP 704/2020 OF FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE
PETITIONER/S:
REVATHY V.S AGED 32 YEARS D/O. SASIDHARAN PILLAI, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AND FATHER SASIDHARAN PILLAI, AGED 67 YEARS, VADAKKEMURIYIL (H), ERUMELY SOUTH, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT686 510 BY ADVS. S.PRASANTH ASWIN KUMAR M J ARUN ROY SHAHIR SHOWKATH ALI
RESPONDENT/S:
SHARATH K S/O. REMASH.K., ANUPAMA NIVAS, NELLIKKODE P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 016 BY ADVS. T.K.SANDEEP VEENA HARIKUMAR
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
Tr.P.(C) No.547 of 2021
-2-
ORDER
Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2021
Learned Counsel for the petitioner presses for orders on the application seeking interim custody of the minor child. Learned Counsel for
the respondents submits that the original petition, of which transfer is sought, was not pressed before the Family Court and nothing survives for consideration in this transfer petition.
As rightly pointed out, as the original petition was not pressed, relief sought herein has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the transfer petition is closed, reserving the petitioner's right to approach the Family Court for appropriate relief.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
Scl/22.12.2021
REVATHY V.S
SHARATH K
V.G.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court