V.K.Susheela v. Ramachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition dismissed as no sufficient ground for review was brought to the notice of the court, despite submission that SLP dismissal should not preclude review.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 26TH PHALGUNA, 1942
RP.No.188 OF 2021 IN SA. 619/2000
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SA 619/2000(F) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3,5 & 6 AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED APPELLANT NO.4:
1 V.K.SUSHEELA, AGED 76, D/O.MALATHI AMMA, RESIDING AT UTTUPURAYIL, AZHIYUR AMSOM AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 673 309.
| 2 | DR.V.K. SANTHI, AGED 75, D/O.MALATHI AMMA, MAHE HOSPITAL, MAHE AMSOM DESOM, PONDICHERRY STATE. 673 310. |
|---|---|
| 3 | V.K. REMANI, AGED 71, D/O. MALATHI AMMA, RESIDING AT UTTUPURAYIL, AZHIYUR AMSOM AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 673 309. |
| 4 | PREMAN, AGED 67, S/O. MALATHI AMMA, RESIDING AT UTTUPURAYIL, AZHIYUR AMSOM AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 673 309. |
| 5 | KRISHNA KUMAR, AGED 63, S/O. MALATHI AMMA, RESIDING AT UTTUPURAYIL, AZHIYUR AMSOM AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 673 309. |
| 6 | PADMA RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 62, W/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, VI/820 A, KOVILAKOM, MUNDOCK HAREESHWARA TEMPLE, MUNDOCK, PUDUCHERRY 673 310. |
| 7 | RAJIV R, AGED 39, S/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, VI/820 A, KOVILAKOM, MUNDOCK |
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.K. Susheela and Others
- respondent
Ramachandran and Others
Coram
P. Somanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court