Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Muhammed Siraj Vs Kadeeja.M.K — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2021)

Home
Kerala HC
2021
Muhammed Siraj Vs Kadeeja.M.KMuhammed Siraj v. Kadeeja.M.K

Dismissed

Muhammed Siraj v. Kadeeja.M.K

Kerala HC6 Jan 2021OP(C)/3087/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Court dismissed the original petition as not pressed. Pending applications were closed. Legal contentions were left open upon request.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR

WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 16TH POUSHA, 1942

OP(C).No.3087 OF 2018

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02-11-2018 IN I.A.NO.528/2018 IN OS NO.16/2017 OF SUB COURT, VADAKARA

PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

MUHAMMED SIRAJ, AGED 32 YEARS S/O ABDUL HAMEED, PARAMBATH HOUSE, VILLIAPALLY, KEEZHAL DESOM, VADAKARA.

BY ADVS.SRI.B.KRISHNAN

SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:

1 KADEEJA.M.K, D/O ABDURAHIMAN, PARAMBATH HOUSE, VILLIAPPALLY, KEEZHAL DESOM, VADAKARA. 673 502.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
MUHAMMED SIRAJ
respondent
KADEEJA.M.K
respondent
JASEERA ANSIYA

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 6 Jan 2021 · January
Registered: 21 Nov 2018
Case no.: OP(C)/3087/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from T.v.anilkumar

Anjana Sivanandan Vs Vinu Krishnan
5 Jan 2021
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs Sathyan
4 Jan 2021
Panayhanthatta Kunjiraman Nambiar Vs Kozhummal Chattadi Valsala
4 Jan 2021
Tini Joseph Vs Sajeev P.V
6 Jan 2021

Cite this judgement

Muhammed Siraj v. Kadeeja.M.K, OP(C)/3087/2018 (KL), decided on 6 January 2021.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

T.V.ANILKUMAR

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The original petition was dismissed for being not pressed. However, the legal contentions raised therein were left open at the petitioner's request. Pending interlocutory applications stand closed.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

2 JASEERA ANSIYA, D/O. ABDUNSAR, JAMAL HOUSE, CHINGAPURAM, KOYILANDY-673 529

R1 BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN

SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN SRI.SABU GEORGE SRI.MANU VYASAN PETER

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O.P.(C)No.3087/2018

-:2:-

Dated this the 6^th day of January,2021

J U D G M E N T

This original petition was filed challenging an order dismissing commission application. Petitioner has filed a not press memo today.

In the result, original petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the contention taken in this original petition are left open at the request made by the petitioner.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand closed.

Sd/-

T.V.ANILKUMAR,JUDGE

DST

//True copy/

P.A.To Judge

T.V.ANILKUMAR

CNR

KLHC010878432018

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED

Ymca Vs T.a.Anthu

6 Jan 2021

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Sreedharan Pillai

7 Jan 2021