Vinodini, v. Reghu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court allowed the withdrawal of a Motor Accident Claims Appeal (MACA No. 686 of 2019). The court dismissed the appeal on the appellants' request and directed the Tribunal to refund the deposited sum.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; direction to refund Rs. 11,150/- deposited by appellants.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 25TH BHADRA, 1943
MACA NO. 686 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 1406/2005 OF II ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT/S:
- 1 VINODINI,W/O LATE THANKAPPAN, GEENA BHAVAN, KALLAMPALLY, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- 2 GEENA,D/O LATE THANKAPPAN, GEENA BHAVAN, KALLAMPALLY, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- 3 DINESH T,S/O LATE THANKAPPAN, GEENA BHAVAN, KALLAMPALLY, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- 4 JEETHA,D/O LATE THANKAPPAN, GEENA BHAVAN, KALLAMPALLY, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Motor Accident Claims Appeal (MACA) should be allowed to be withdrawn and deposit refunded.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VINODINI W/O LATE THANKAPPAN and others
- respondent
REGHU
- respondent
RATHEESH CHANDRAN
- respondent
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court