Dismissed

C. Najeeb v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC28 Oct 2021Crl.MC/998/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Criminal Misc. Case filed by an accused to quash proceedings for illegal electricity sales. The Court held that the 2007 amendment to Section 151 of the Electricity Act permits courts to take cognizance based on police reports, dismissing the plea. The petitioner may still raise contentions in trial or compound under Section 152.

What did the court decide?

Petition to quash proceedings was dismissed; petitioner permitted to raise contentions in trial or availing compounding under Section 152.

C. Najeeb Vs State of Kerala — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

Crl.M.C.No.998/2014

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

¶6

THURSDAY, THE 28^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943

¶7

CRL.MC NO. 998 OF 2014

¶8

CRIME NO.842/2004 OF Ernakulam Central Police Station,

¶9

Ernakulam

¶10

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 2/2013 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - VII, ERNAKULAM / III ADDITIONAL MACT,

¶11

ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

¶12

PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED:

¶13

C. NAJEEB, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.LATE K.K.MOIDU, MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHICAGO PLAZA, RESIDING AT THAMANNA, S.R.M.ROAD, ERNAKULAM18.

¶14

BY ADV SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.

¶15

RESPONDENT/STATE:

¶16

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. (REPRESENTING THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM).

¶17

2 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, ELECTRICAL SECTION, COLLEGE ROAD, ERNAKULAM. (ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 06.02.2014 IN CRL.M.A.NO.1432/14 IN CRL.M.C.998/2014)

¶18

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2021, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.816/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.M.C.No.998/2014

O R D E R

The petitioner, who is the sole accused in C.C.No.2/2013 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court-VII, Ernakulam, has filed this Crl.M.C. seeking to quash all further proceedings therein. The aforesaid Sessions Case arises from Crime No 842/2004 of Ernakulam Central Police Station.

¶23

Offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 135, 138, 140 and 149 of Electricity Act. The aforesaid crime was registered against the petitioner, on the basis of an inspection conducted by the Anti Power Theft Squad of Kerala State Electricity Board, on 02.10.2004. During the aforesaid inspection, it was found that the petitioner was indulging in illegal sale of electricity. The police, after completing the investigation has filed Annexure-A charge sheet for the offences mentioned above and cognizance of the same was taken thereon by the jurisdictional Magistrate. Later, when a Special Court was constituted for the offences under the Electricity Act, 2003,

¶24

Crl.M.C.No.998/2014

¶25

¶26

the case was transferred to the Special Court i.e., Additional Sessions Court VII, Ernakulam.

¶27

The basic contention raised by the petitioner is that as

¶28

per Section 151 of Electricity Act, 2003 [as stood prior to the amendment vide Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007 (Act 26 of 2007)], no court can take cognizance of the offence under Electricity Act, except on a complaint made by the authorities mentioned therein. According to him police is not one among the authorities mentioned therein and the said provision does not authorize the court to take cognizance on a final report submitted by the police.

¶29

Heard Sri.B.H.Mansoor, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.A.Arunkumar, learned standing counsel for the Kerala State Electricity Board and Sri.Sudheer Gopalakrishnan, learned Public Prosecutor.

¶30

As regards the offences under the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, the contention raised by the petitioner is covered against him as per judgment in Vishal Agarwal and Another v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board and

¶31

Crl.M.C.No.998/2014

¶32

¶33

Another [2014 (1) KLT 1013] . It is pertinent to note in this regard that, as per the amendment brought in with effect from 15.06.2007 a proviso was added to Section 151 of the Electricity Act, 2003, permitting the Court to take cognizance of the offences under the Act, upon a police report as well. In the said judgment, the Honourable Supreme Court categorically observed that the amendment brought to Section 151 of Electricity Act with effect from 15.06.2007, enables the court to take cognizance on the basis of final report of the police and such amendment is clarificatory in nature. Thus it was held that, the permission granted as per the amended provision, is applicable to all proceedings including the cases where the date of occurrence of the offence is prior to the amendment. In the light of the principles laid down as above, the contention of the petitioner with regard to the cognizance taken on the offences under Section 135, 138, 140 and 149 of the Electricity Act are not legally sustainable.

¶34

In such circumstances, this Crl.M.C is devoid of any merits and accordingly it is dismissed. However, it is clarified

¶35

Crl.M.C.No.998/2014

¶36

¶37

that, the petitioner shall be entitled to raise all his contentions before the trial court and shall also be entitled to avail the compounding facility, as contemplated under section 152 of the Electricity Act, 2003, if he chooses.

¶38

Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE

DG/28.10.21

Crl.M.C.No.998/2014

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 998/2014

¶43

PETITIONER ANNEXURE:

¶44

ANNEXURE-A: A COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.842/2004 OF ERNAKULAM CENTRAL POLICE STATION.

¶45

Crl.M.C.No.998/2014

¶46

¶47

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 816/2014

¶48

PETITIONER ANNEXURE

¶49

ANNEXURE-A: COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.976/2006 OF ERNAKULAM CENTRAL POLICE STATION.

C. Najeeb v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C. Najeeb v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.R. Dinesh Vs State of Kerala

Fasil Muhammed Vs State of Kerala

Retnamma Vs the State of Kerala

C.Najeeb Vs State of Kerala

Joy Lazar Vs State of Kerala

Joy Lazar Vs State of Kerala