Allowed

Joy Lazar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC28 Oct 2021Crl.MC/3729/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, in Criminal Misc. Cases 3729/2015, 3611/2015, and 3890/2015, granted a petitioner's request to withdraw the proceedings. The withdrawal was made without prejudice to the right to file for discharge before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw Crl.M.C. No. 3729/2015, 3611/2015, and 3890/2015 without prejudice to the right to seek discharge.

Joy Lazar Vs State of Kerala — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 28^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943

¶5

CRL.MC NO.3729 OF 2015

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

JOY LAZAR, AGED 52 YEARS, ALUKKAL HOUSE, P.O.CHITTISSERY, PUTHUKKAD, THRISSUR-680301, (PRESIDENT AYURDHANYA INDUSTRIES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR-4).

¶8

BY ADVS. SRI.C.D.DILEEP SMT.SHYLAJA VARGHESE

¶9

RESPONDENT/S:

¶10

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶11

2 S.I.OF POLICE,

¶12

THRISSUR WEST POLICE STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 003.

¶13

3 LINI SONY, AGED 26 YEARS,

¶14

W/O.SONY GEORGE, CHIRAYATH HOUSE, NETTISSERY DESOM, OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR.

¶15

R1 & R2 BY SRI.ARAVIND MATHEW, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶16

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2021, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.3611/2015, 3890/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

Crl.M.C.3729/15 & Conns.

¶18

¶19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶20

PRESENT

¶21

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

¶22

THURSDAY, THE 28^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943

¶23

CRL.MC NO. 3611 OF 2015

¶24

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 293/2013 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL

¶25

MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR

¶26

PETITIONER/S:

¶27

1 JOY LAZAR, AGED 52 YEARS, ALUKKAL HOUSE, P.O.CHITTISSERY, PUTHUKKAD, THRISSUR-680 301. (PRESIDENT AYURDHANYA INDUSTRIES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR-4).

¶28

2 SAJAN EDWARD, AGED 57 YEARS, PERINKULATH HOUSE, MEPPADI, THRIKAIPETTA, VYANAND.

¶29

BY ADVS. SRI.C.D.DILEEP SMT.SHYLAJA VARGHESE

¶30

RESPONDENT/S:

¶31

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI-31.

¶32

2 S.I.OF POLICE, THRISSUR WEST POLICE STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. PIN-680 003.

¶33

3 SANITHA, AGED 31 YEARS, W/O.SANTHOSH, PRESIDENT, KATTUNGAL HOUSE, POONKUNNAM DESOM, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR-680 020.

¶34

BY SRI.ARAVIND MATHEW, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶35

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2021, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.3729/2015 AND 3890/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶36

Crl.M.C.3729/15 & Conns.

¶37

¶38

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶39

PRESENT

¶40

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

¶41

THURSDAY, THE 28^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943

¶42

CRL.MC NO.3890 OF 2015

¶43

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 292/2013 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL

¶44

MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR

¶45

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:

¶46

JOY LAZAR, AGED 52 YEARS, ALUKKAL HOUSE, P.O.CHITTISSERY, PUTHUKKAD, THRISSUR 680301(PRESIDENT AYURDHANYA INDUSTRIES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.), POOTHOLE, THRISSUR 4

¶47

BY ADV SRI.C.D.DILEEP

¶48

RESPONDENTS:

¶49

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶50

2 S.I OF POLICE, THRISSUR WEST POLICE STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 003.

¶51

3 RIMMI, AGED 26 YEARS,

¶52

KANNANAIKKAL HOUSE, KALVARI ROAD, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR 680 004.

¶53

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2021, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.3729/2015 AND 3611/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶54

Crl.M.C.3729/15 & Conns.

¶55

¶56

O R D E R

¶57

[Crl.MC Nos.3729/2015, 3611/2015, 3890/2015]

¶58

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C without prejudice to their right to seek for discharge before the trial court. Permission is granted.

¶59

Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the contentions put forward by the petitioners in this case. The petitioners shall be at liberty to raise all the contentions before the trial court while seeking discharge.

¶60

Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE

¶61

DG/28.10.21

Joy Lazar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joy Lazar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.R. Dinesh Vs State of Kerala

Fasil Muhammed Vs State of Kerala

Retnamma Vs the State of Kerala

C.Najeeb Vs State of Kerala

C. Najeeb Vs State of Kerala

Joy Lazar Vs State of Kerala