Ravi P.D. v. Subhan.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a direction to effect tax register additions, the court closed the case after the respondent's counsel submitted proof of compliance via a proceeding dated 28.12.2020.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed upon satisfaction of compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 16TH POUSHA, 1942
Con.Case(C) No.968 OF 2020 IN W.P.(C) No.41634/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.41634/2018(D) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
RAVI P.D., AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.DAMODHARAN, 'VYSRAVAM', ERANHIPALAM(P.O.), CALICUT-673 006.
BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR
RESPONDENT:
SUBHAN.P., (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), TAHASILDAR, KOZIKODE TALUK, CIVIL STATION, CIVIL STATION (P.O.), KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 020.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt case is maintainable since the respondent had complied with the direction of the earlier judgment.
Whether the learned Government Pleader has satisfied the court about compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ravi P.D.
- respondent
Subhan.P.
- respondent
A.C.Vidhya
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court