This is a contempt petition challenging non-compliance of directives in W.P.(C) No. 23610/2018. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the directives were complied with, leading the court to dismiss the petition without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
WEDNESDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.503 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 23610/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23610/2018(A) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
JANCY THOMAS AGED 47 YEARS W/O.THOMAS JOSEPH, LEMON VILLA, CHERTHALA NORTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA NORTH MURI, CHERTHALA.P.O, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688524
BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
V.T.THOMAS
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, CHAIRMAN, CERTHALA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688524
NAME OF THE RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED AS 'V.T.JOSEPH' VIDE ORDER DATED 11/3/2020 IN IA 1/2020 IN COC 503/2020
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
Con.Case(C).No.503 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 23610/2018
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 3rd day of March 2021
This Contempt Petition is filed complaining
that the directives contained in the judgment dated 16.07.2018 in W.P.(C) No.23610/2018 is not complied with.
up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted
that the directives are already complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the
Contempt case any further.
accordingly.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
hmh
3
Con.Case(C).No.503 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 23610/2018
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE BY HEARING ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT, DATED 12.10.2018
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL
Jancy Thomas Aged 47 Years W/o. Thomas Joseph
V.T. Thomas Aged and Father's Name Not Known
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
