Ayswarya P.A. v. Ajayan
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition alleged failure by the respondent to reinstate the petitioner as ordered. The court noted partial compliance via affidavits. The judge held that further complaints regarding unpaid salary and duties must be addressed in the principal writ petition, and closed the contempt case.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 1ST MAGHA, 1942 Con.Case(C).No.50 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 27220/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27220/2020(B) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
AYSWARYA P.A. AGED 30 YEARS W/O AJITH P S, RESIDING AT PATHACK HOUSE, PUTHUSSERIMALA P O, RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA-689672.
BY ADV. DR.THUSHARA JAMES
RESPONDENT
AJAYAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, RESIDING AT KARTHIKA, RANNI P O, VAIKOM-689672.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.SAJJAD
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
whether the petitioner had been reinstated in service and paid salary in compliance with the interim order dated 18/12/2020.
whether the partial compliance by the respondent warranted penalties in this contempt proceeding.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AYSWARYA P.A.
- respondent
AJAYAN
Coram
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court