Dismissed

Sheeja V.G. v. Perumbadappu Grama Panchayath

Kerala HC20 Jan 2021WP(C)/16856/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding arrears of dues, the High Court of Kerala recorded the respondents' submission that amounts were paid. The court closed the petition but granted liberty to the petitioners to seek a hearing if they fail to obtain their eligible amounts.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is closed subject to liberty to seek hearing if all petitioners have not received their dues.

Sheeja V.G. Vs Perumbadappu Grama Panchayath — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 30TH POUSHA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.16856 OF 2020(F)

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1 SHEEJA V.G. AGED 41 YEARS KANNAZHIYATH HOUSE, AYIROOR, AYIROOR P.O., PERUMPADAPPU, MALAPPURAM-679580.

¶8

2 MUBEENA T. THANNITHURAKKAL HOUSE, PALAPETTY, PALAPETTY P.O., PERUMBADAPPU, MALAPPURAM-679579.

¶9

3 GEETHA P., CHANAYIL HOUSE, AYIROOR, AYIROOR P.O., PERUMBADAPPU, MALAPPURAM-679580.

¶10

BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM KUM.SREEJI K.B.

¶11

RESPONDENTS:

¶12

1 PERUMBADAPPU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PERUMBADAPPU, PIN679580.

¶13

2 THE SECRETARY, PERUMBADAPPU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PERUMBADAPPU, PIN679580.

¶14

3 THE IMPLEMENTING OFFICER, NATIONAL AYUSH MISSION, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM -676505.

¶15

R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL

¶16

SRI. SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE - GP

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

WP(C).No.16856 OF 2020 2

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

Dated this the 20th day of January 2021

¶21

Today when this matter was called the learned counsel

¶22

for the respondents submitted that whole amount due to the petitioners have already been paid.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioners affirm that the 3^rd petitioner has received her dues, but is not sure whether the others have.

¶24

However, taking note of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the respondent and recording the same, I close this writ petition; however, leaving liberty to the petitioners to seek a hearing if all of them are yet to obtain their eligible amounts.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

SMF/20.01

¶29

WP(C).No.16856 OF 2020 3

¶30

APPENDIX

¶31

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

¶32

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30/04/2018 ADDRESSED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE DOCTOR IN CHARGE OF THE CENTRE.

¶33

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH DATED 05/12/2018 AUTHORIZING THE SECRETARY FOR PAYMENT OF THE WAGES. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04/09/2019 IN WPC 11528/2019 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18/06/2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS ON 28/07/2020. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.A3/2746/2020 DATED 28/07/2020 ISSUED ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT OF EXT.P4.

¶34

//TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

Sheeja V.G. v. Perumbadappu Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheeja V.G. v. Perumbadappu Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesan M Vs the State of Kerala

Saji P.K. Vs State of Kerala

C.T.Betty Vs State of Kerala

The Manager, M.V.H.S.S. Arumanoor Vs the District Educational Officer, Neyyattinkara

Aparna Mohan Vs the State of Kerala

S.Mohankumar Sumanam Vs the Institute 0F Management in Government